<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3 Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clete2.com/2008/03/27/firefox-3-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clete2.com/2008/03/27/firefox-3-review/</link>
	<description>Clete's Personal Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Clete&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Update to Firefox Review (3.0 RC1 Released!)</title>
		<link>http://clete2.com/2008/03/27/firefox-3-review/#comment-2389</link>
		<dc:creator>Clete&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Update to Firefox Review (3.0 RC1 Released!)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 05:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clete2.com/2008/03/27/firefox-3-review/#comment-2389</guid>
		<description>[...] also want to report that the Acid 3 test still ends on 71/100, as it did in Beta 5. (See my previous review of Beta 4 and Beta 5) Since the trees are locked down, we can expect that Firefox 3 RTM will not correctly display the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] also want to report that the Acid 3 test still ends on 71/100, as it did in Beta 5. (See my previous review of Beta 4 and Beta 5) Since the trees are locked down, we can expect that Firefox 3 RTM will not correctly display the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clete R. Blackwell II</title>
		<link>http://clete2.com/2008/03/27/firefox-3-review/#comment-2154</link>
		<dc:creator>Clete R. Blackwell II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 20:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clete2.com/2008/03/27/firefox-3-review/#comment-2154</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment. I am disappointed about the Acid 3 test. I guess I figured that Firefox adhered to more of the standards than they actually do. I just checked and Acid 2 works perfectly on Firefox 3 Beta 4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment. I am disappointed about the Acid 3 test. I guess I figured that Firefox adhered to more of the standards than they actually do. I just checked and Acid 2 works perfectly on Firefox 3 Beta 4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirk Gently</title>
		<link>http://clete2.com/2008/03/27/firefox-3-review/#comment-2153</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Gently</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clete2.com/2008/03/27/firefox-3-review/#comment-2153</guid>
		<description>nice review.  got to see some of the details of firefox 3 others haven't talked about.  This tagging feature sounds nice if its implemented nicely.  The acid 3 is disappointing though, though I heard firefox 3 does well with acid 2 tests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice review.  got to see some of the details of firefox 3 others haven&#8217;t talked about.  This tagging feature sounds nice if its implemented nicely.  The acid 3 is disappointing though, though I heard firefox 3 does well with acid 2 tests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
